Skip to main content
BlockchainInvestment Tribe

When Crypto is Not Considered a Security: Insights from the Ripple Case Verdict

By July 24, 2023No Comments

A Landmark Case for Cryptocurrencies and Securities: The Ripple Case

The recent case between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple, a prominent blockchain company, has shed light on the classification of cryptocurrencies as securities.

The SEC accused Ripple and its executives of conducting an unregistered securities offering through the sale of XRP, Ripple’s native cryptocurrency. This closely watched case has significant implications for the broader cryptocurrency industry and challenges the SEC’s assertion that most crypto tokens should be treated as securities.

In this article, we explore the outcomes of the Ripple case and its impact on the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies.


Understanding the SEC’s Regulatory Approach in the Ripple Case

The SEC has been actively pursuing enforcement actions against cryptocurrencies, with over 100 cases initiated. While many have resulted in settlements, a few have gone to court, resulting in judges generally siding with the SEC’s classification of tokens as securities. These rulings have subjected cryptocurrencies to registration and comprehensive disclosure requirements. The Ripple case, however, offers a different perspective on this matter.


Judge’s Ruling: XRP Sales on Public Exchanges Not Considered Securities

Judge Analisa Torres, presiding over the Ripple case, ruled that XRP sales on public cryptocurrency exchanges did not qualify as securities offerings. Her analysis centred around the concept of a reasonable expectation of profit linked to Ripple’s efforts.

Referring to these transactions as “blind bid/ask transactions,” the judge noted that buyers could not ascertain whether their payments directly benefited Ripple or other XRP sellers. This ruling aligns with a U.S. Supreme Court precedent that defines securities as investments where profits derived solely from the efforts of others.

Exemptions and Exceptions: XRP Sales and Distributions

Judge Torres also addressed XRP sales on cryptocurrency platforms by Ripple executives and other distributions, including employee compensation. She determined that these transactions did not involve securities.

However, the SEC achieved a partial victory as the judge concluded that Ripple’s sales to hedge funds and sophisticated buyers constituted unregistered securities offerings. These sales targeted institutional investors and presented XRP as a speculative value proposition tied to Ripple’s blockchain infrastructure development.


Key Takeaways and Future Implications of the Ripple Case

The Ripple case verdict provides some clarity on when a cryptocurrency may not be classified as a security. It highlights the importance of the nature of transactions and reasonable profit expectations for purchasers.

However, the classification of digital assets as securities remains a complex and evolving area. As the regulatory landscape continues to take shape, further legal developments are expected to impact how cryptocurrencies are regulated.


Bottomline: Navigating the Complexities of Cryptocurrency Regulation

The Ripple case verdict marks an important milestone in the ongoing discussion around the classification of cryptocurrencies as securities. It demonstrates that not all crypto tokens will automatically be deemed securities, and the specifics of each case matter.

As the crypto industry matures and regulators refine their approaches, market participants must stay informed about the evolving regulatory landscape. The Ripple case serves as a reminder that legal developments will shape the future of cryptocurrency regulations and influence the path forward for blockchain-based innovations.


Check our LinkedIn for more insightful articles like this.